![]() |
Home - Register for Practice Exams - Tour -Testimonials - Sample EMT B Tests - Sample EMT I Tests - Sample Paramedic Tests - Terms of Use - Support / Help - NREMT Tests - FAQ - About Us
These EMT and Paramedic training forums are for discussion. If you need help or have a support issue please click on the Support/Help link on any page of the website and open a support ticket.
![]() ![]() |
Aug 22 2009, 06:41 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 17-August 09 Member No.: 4,275 |
I am a certified State License Test Evaluator. Over the past eight years I have seen testing for EMT B and I levels devolve from scenario-based skills testing - requiring assessment, life threat treatments, and patient packaging - to an assessment with stated interventions and one skill being demonstrated, to the newly proposed paper examination only test.
I believe this progression (or regression) will be dangerous for future patient care and will reflect badly on the professionalism of EMTs as well. The liability implications in allowing newly minted EMT's to enter the prehospital care arena (especially in volunteer services) with no certification of their ability to actually perform hands-on patient care is staggering. State testing was also supposed to provide feedback to training institutions on perceived shortfalls in both didactic and psychomotor realms of learning. With the removal of skills assessments for licensing, only assessment and basic knowledge will be tested. The State says it is relying on training institutions to certify skills however the level of psychomotor training differs from institution to institution depending on the amount of practice time allocated and given and the skill of the instructors. I would like to solicit comments from this board on this matter... Thank you |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 04:22 PM |